Hi On 2020-02-28, [email protected] wrote: > Hi, > > > On 2020-02-28, Koen Vandeputte wrote: [...] > > All supported targets have been provided with kernel 5.4 as the "Testing > > kernel". > > This means you can enable 5.4 by selecting "Global --> use the testing > > kernel > > version" within menuconfig. > > Thanks for your work. > > By moving ag71xx to files-4.19 on ath79, I suspect 4.14 is broken now on > this target. > So, we should either copy that to files-4.14 as well or remove the > remaining 4.14 files there as well (where I'd prefer the latter).
ath79 with kernel 4.14 has already been (mostly) broken by "ath79: add new ar934x spi driver" (ebf0d8dadeca443121f4f597c51bf6591e341caf), which does break the (shared between all kernel versions) DTS definitions for NAND based ath79 devices (breaking compilation with kernel 4.14). Because of "FS#2524 - ath79-tiny: TP-Link TL-WR941ND v2.4: Marvel MV88E6060 regression between kernel v4.14 and v4.19" https://bugs.openwrt.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=2524 I still do regularly build ath79 with kernel 4.14, but in order to finish the build I do need to comment out the affected devices: $ grep \# ath79-k414.diff +#TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_cpe210-v1 +#TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_cpe220-v2 +#TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_cpe510-v1 +#TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_cpe510-v2 +#TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_cpe510-v3 +#TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_cpe610-v1 +#TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_tl-wdr3500-v1 +#TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_tl-wdr3600-v1 +#TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_tl-wdr4300-v1 +#TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_tl-wdr4300-v1-il +#TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_tl-wr842n-v2 +#TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_wbs210-v2 +#TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_wbs510-v1 +#TARGET_DEVICES += tplink_wbs510-v2 +#TARGET_DEVICES += ubnt_bullet-m-xw +#TARGET_DEVICES += ubnt_lap-120 +#TARGET_DEVICES += ubnt_litebeam-ac-gen2 +#TARGET_DEVICES += ubnt_nanobeam-ac +#TARGET_DEVICES += ubnt_nanostation-ac +#TARGET_DEVICES += ubnt_nanostation-ac-loco +#TARGET_DEVICES += ubnt_nanostation-loco-m-xw +#TARGET_DEVICES += ubnt_nanostation-m-xw +#TARGET_DEVICES += comfast_cf-e120a-v3 +#TARGET_DEVICES += dlink_dir-825-c1 +#TARGET_DEVICES += dlink_dir-835-a1 +#TARGET_DEVICES += iodata_etg3-r +#TARGET_DEVICES += iodata_wn-ag300dgr +#TARGET_DEVICES += ocedo_raccoon +#TARGET_DEVICES += pcs_cap324 +#TARGET_DEVICES += pcs_cr3000 +#TARGET_DEVICES += pcs_cr5000 +#TARGET_DEVICES += pisen_wmb001n +#TARGET_DEVICES += qihoo_c301 +#TARGET_DEVICES += sitecom_wlr-7100 +#TARGET_DEVICES += teltonika_rut955 +#TARGET_DEVICES += wd_mynet-n750 +#TARGET_DEVICES += wd_mynet-wifi-rangeextender +#TARGET_DEVICES += winchannel_wb2000 +#TARGET_DEVICES += zbtlink_zbt-wd323 Admittedly, the affected TL-WR941ND v2 (4/32) is barely worth the effort anymore. Regards Stefan Lippers-Hollmann _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
