I am all for exposing Cone Nat in UCI / Firewall zones as an option to the masquerading configuration in a zone.
Also as much as I hate it nat66 for IPv6 needs to be exposed in the same place - specifically for mapping routable PD which change often to ULA's. -Joel On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 07:25, Gracias Amigou <[email protected]> wrote: > Please add this package as official: > > *Posts:* > > 1. xt_FULLCONENAT -- Implementing RFC 3489 full cone SNAT in OpenWrt > > <https://forum.openwrt.org/t/xt-fullconenat-implementing-rfc-3489-full-cone-snat-in-openwrt/14816> > 2. [12/8更新]OpenWrt 上实现 NAT1 (Full cone NAT) 的方法，无需 DMZ/UPnP - OPENWRT专版 > <https://www.right.com.cn/forum/thread-319827-1-1.html> > 3. 从DNAT到netfilter内核子系统，浅谈Linux的Full Cone NAT实现 | ChionLab > <https://blog.chionlab.moe/2018/02/09/full-cone-nat-with-linux/> > > > *Git:* > • GitHub - LGA1150/openwrt-fullconenat: Netfilter and iptables extension > for full cone NAT ported to OpenWrt. > <https://github.com/LGA1150/openwrt-fullconenat> > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
