*Read this:* *• *Gaming with Full Cone vs Symmetric NAT Routers <http://badmodems.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=21>
It is a feature that is necessary and should be by default in OpenWrt. I hope you will add it in the next releases or at least the package. Thank you. El lun., 4 may. 2020 a las 14:52, Joel Wirāmu Pauling (<[email protected]>) escribió: > I am all for exposing Cone Nat in UCI / Firewall zones as an option to the > masquerading configuration in a zone. > > Also as much as I hate it nat66 for IPv6 needs to be exposed in the same > place - specifically for mapping routable PD which change often to ULA's. > > -Joel > > On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 07:25, Gracias Amigou <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Please add this package as official: >> >> *Posts:* >> >> 1. xt_FULLCONENAT -- Implementing RFC 3489 full cone SNAT in OpenWrt >> >> <https://forum.openwrt.org/t/xt-fullconenat-implementing-rfc-3489-full-cone-snat-in-openwrt/14816> >> 2. [12/8更新]OpenWrt 上实现 NAT1 (Full cone NAT) 的方法，无需 DMZ/UPnP - >> OPENWRT专版 <https://www.right.com.cn/forum/thread-319827-1-1.html> >> 3. 从DNAT到netfilter内核子系统，浅谈Linux的Full Cone NAT实现 | ChionLab >> <https://blog.chionlab.moe/2018/02/09/full-cone-nat-with-linux/> >> >> >> *Git:* >> • GitHub - LGA1150/openwrt-fullconenat: Netfilter and iptables extension >> for full cone NAT ported to OpenWrt. >> <https://github.com/LGA1150/openwrt-fullconenat> >> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >> >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
