On 09/07/2020 05:04, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
Before disabling support for SUSv2 by default on BusyBox, care must be taken to
ensure the arguments are SUSv3-compliant. Make it so.
Unless the size savings are very high to justify it, it is probably a
very bad idea to disable SuS-v2 support in busybox.
And it would need to be a sizeable reduction to be worth it indeed: as
you already noticed, some of it will be lost with compatibility syntax
changes.
Removing SuSv2 from busybox is too damn likely to bite people badly
downstream. Please reconsider. This is *NOT* a "no-brainer" change, it
is a tidal wave that ripples down to everything that uses OpenWRT, every
feed, every downstream, and users.
--
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Analista de Projetos
Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas em Tecnologias de Redes e Operações
(Ceptro.br)
+55 11 5509-3537 R.:4023
INOC 22548*625
www.nic.br
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
