On 09/07/2020 10:19, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
down this rabbit hole. Please disregard this patch, as well as the one
I sent to change the default behaviour of BusyBox. It's just not worth
the hassle and potential issues, at all.

I do not oppose any patches to switch scripts to SuSv3 syntax: in the end the increase of a few bytes (use "-n1" instead of "-n 1" maybe) is but noise on the compressed image, might even reduce its size for all I know depending on what happens to the huffman dictionaries or equivalent.

It is just the busybox removal of susv2 support that would cause trouble.

--
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to