Also interesting:
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/1773#issuecomment-459230119

On 2/17/21 11:02 AM, David Bauer wrote:
Hi,

On 2/17/21 9:20 AM, Perry wrote:
Hello,

I thought the kernel size issue was resolved by 
1e41de2f48e284c9d6658f9403365651178f6826

Also, the linked PR #1773 has a happy ending.

Is the simpleImage no longer a viable solution? Could you explain why not?
the issue was resolved for v5.4 with using a different PPC bootwrapper. However,
as the kernel grew again with v5.10, this was already back then set to break 
again in
the future, as the bootwrapper only enables a more efficient compression but 
does not by
itself read from the flash.

Best wishes
David

Greetings
Perry

On February 17, 2021 5:59:28 AM GMT+01:00, David Bauer <[email protected]> 
wrote:
Hi Daniel,

On 2/17/21 4:21 AM, Daniel Golle wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:48:04PM +0100, David Bauer wrote:
Tested on: Sophos RED 15W

The TP-Link WL-WDR4900 needs to be disabled when 5.10 becomes the
default kernel.
That's sad. Why?
See the next sentence ;) as well as this GitHub issue:
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/1773

Best
David
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to