On 23.05.21 11:01, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
...
diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk
b/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk
index 74f8603b5a..0072ec527d 100644
--- a/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk
+++ b/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk
@@ -9,6 +9,15 @@ define Device/mikrotik_routerboard-493g endef
TARGET_DEVICES += mikrotik_routerboard-493g
+define Device/mikrotik_routerboard-912g
+ $(Device/mikrotik_nand)
+ SOC := ar9342
+ DEVICE_MODEL := RouterBOARD 912G
+ DEVICE_PACKAGES += kmod-usb-ehci kmod-usb2 kmod-gpio-beeper
+ SUPPORTED_DEVICES += rb-912uag-5hpnd rb-912uag-2hpnd endef
So, both have exactly the same setup as implemented here?
Best
Adrian
yes.
I personally use rb-912uag-5hpnd board.
The hardware is identical with the exception of the band used.
What's your 2 cents to get both supported using a single target?
Thanks,
Koen
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
