Correct order of rsrp and rsrq parameters for print_lte_info.

Signed-off-by: Jan-Niklas Burfeind <[email protected]>
---

This was introduced in
d647f8d89f68 uqmi: add more diagnostics commands

Currently --get-cell-location-info prints the rsrq and rsrp values
swapped.
I ignored the checkpatch.pl warning for line lengths, as the long line is
already in the codebase and only got swapped in their order.


 commands-nas.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/commands-nas.c b/commands-nas.c
index 01ca3b8..ff7a6c3 100644
--- a/commands-nas.c
+++ b/commands-nas.c
@@ -772,8 +772,8 @@ cmd_nas_get_cell_location_info_cb(struct qmi_dev *qmi, 
struct qmi_request *req,
                for (i = 0; i < res.data.intrafrequency_lte_info_v2.cell_n; 
i++) {
                        cell = blobmsg_open_table(&status, NULL);
                        
print_lte_info(res.data.intrafrequency_lte_info_v2.cell[i].physical_cell_id,
-                                      
res.data.intrafrequency_lte_info_v2.cell[i].rsrq,
                                       
res.data.intrafrequency_lte_info_v2.cell[i].rsrp,
+                                      
res.data.intrafrequency_lte_info_v2.cell[i].rsrq,
                                       
res.data.intrafrequency_lte_info_v2.cell[i].rssi);
                        if (res.data.intrafrequency_lte_info_v2.ue_in_idle)
                                blobmsg_add_u32(&status, 
"cell_selection_rx_level",
@@ -798,8 +798,8 @@ cmd_nas_get_cell_location_info_cb(struct qmi_dev *qmi, 
struct qmi_request *req,
                        for (j = 0; j < 
res.data.interfrequency_lte_info.frequency[i].cell_n; j++) {
                                cell = blobmsg_open_table(&status, NULL);
                                
print_lte_info(res.data.interfrequency_lte_info.frequency[i].cell[j].physical_cell_id,
-                                              
res.data.interfrequency_lte_info.frequency[i].cell[j].rsrq,
                                               
res.data.interfrequency_lte_info.frequency[i].cell[j].rsrp,
+                                              
res.data.interfrequency_lte_info.frequency[i].cell[j].rsrq,
                                               
res.data.interfrequency_lte_info.frequency[i].cell[j].rssi);
                                if (res.data.interfrequency_lte_info.ue_in_idle)
                                        blobmsg_add_u32(&status, 
"cell_selection_rx_level",
-- 
2.35.1


_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to