-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Is 0 the wan? If so, shouldn't it be on eth1?
It's not uncommon for ports to be unsoldered. So port 0 is probably just a dead-end. > Doesn't that mean all ports -- the 4 switch ones and the wan -- are > grouped together on the same vlan? No. > However, if I reconfigure the network in what I believe to be the > old style format, This is the new format. > it works (wireless can connect to lan; lan can connect to > outside). Am I missing something here? You confused old and new formats. > are accurate. Is the drawing in the later also somewhere lost in > the wiki? Port numbering changes randomly accross WRT54G/L/GS revisions, there's probably no picture for your particular rev. > /network/switch but am still confused. Let's say I want to define > the following: The broadcom switch driver only supports VIDs up to 15. ~ Jow -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlCHtTwACgkQdputYINPTPNmtwCggTXWmGCH5zAm2i5byYQGz9zB s/YAoKLC8f/sHQwPLjPOVH7a3T+kZ3Rb =9C5c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ openwrt-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users
