On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich <[email protected]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>> Is 0 the wan? If so, shouldn't it be on eth1?
>
> It's not uncommon for ports to be unsoldered. So port 0 is probably just
> a dead-end.
>
Ok
>> Doesn't that mean all ports -- the 4 switch ones and the wan -- are
>> grouped together on the same vlan?
>
> No.
>
>> However, if I reconfigure the network in what I believe to be the
>> old style format,
>
> This is the new format.
>
>> it works (wireless can connect to lan; lan can connect to
>> outside). Am I missing something here?
>
> You confused old and new formats.
>
Ok. I can handle that.
>> are accurate. Is the drawing in the later also somewhere lost in
>> the wiki?
>
> Port numbering changes randomly accross WRT54G/L/GS revisions, there's
> probably no picture for your particular rev.
>
I see. I was confused since the picture in the blog I mentioned
looks just like the one in the wiki, but with the proper ports for my
own router.
>> /network/switch but am still confused. Let's say I want to define
>> the following:
>
> The broadcom switch driver only supports VIDs up to 15.
>
I see. Now, how do I set that up? So far I could not find an
example that made sense to me.
>
> ~ Jow
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlCHtTwACgkQdputYINPTPNmtwCggTXWmGCH5zAm2i5byYQGz9zB
> s/YAoKLC8f/sHQwPLjPOVH7a3T+kZ3Rb
> =9C5c
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users
_______________________________________________
openwrt-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users
