-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Yes, nodogsplash is a simplified version of wifidog. wifidog has support for remote databases etc.. You should use what tool does the job. :)
On 09/25/2014 09:12 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > knowing next to nothing about captive portals, i'm sure this is a > silly question but what is the state of the art for that kind of > openwrt software? > > i'm reading this: > > http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/wireless.overview#captive.portal.software.available.in.the.openwrt.repository > > and just trying to figure out how those packages relate. it *seems* > that: > > * nodogsplash is a *simple* solution > * wifidog is far more complete and sophisticated > > is that correct? would one choose one or the other, but not both? is > there a general preference? > > rday > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUJJZVAAoJECHrh56PP4wplZQH/0K0TwPFS2QjD7gZM2XAoGml Wi880CswggKGmYEQnjkEBDvOudC6plc2VFfQgCbgRB9VvlslnHpePtDSlDIN3mXE IeLDOvMtXzH02HVjquOYsnLg/DpI8WFRIW5CssxdfQg4uq+/P6vIekWDqTw+tBmE tLk7Wb4F6l7vIG9FLnIv4hIunZOoCCAxfg4BwlUDFUo8BPvw7Zi1MFLPEKbSspsq ikVADi99xUQf7xjt86g2g8O0/Lz3IMol1ADrGZnyM+aAVlhwS+D2y+yx1gW/cRFn 2rz6bxyx54PYzIh276DKv6fKONPAEb1Qd+fHtcHmKRh/jUJiEm+OetcNcYKm4BU= =4ayM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ openwrt-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users
