> Ok, but there is another point of view. In my private mail > people ask for fresh features or bugfixes not yet ported and > registered with the FreeBSD ports system. Submitting port via > formal procedure takes time for e.g. famous regression tests > of freebsd team. With nightly ports publicly available > situation tends to relax. > > If linux people do not need a work done by somebody else, and > prefer everything done by themselves, then ok, they do not need it. > > As for testing. > > Yes, night builder is the first one to notice missing entries > in Manifest. As for me, I feel absolutely stupid reporting to > the list missing entries in the Manifest after nearly each > commit. You could have noticed that I stopped doing so. > Instead, had to enforce "make manifest" > by hand in the night builder script. > > Do you think that "make manifest" could be included inside of > each target for make in the initial source code (I am not an > expert with automatic making of Makefile) ?
Well then its quite ok... and because i dont know the freebsd way, i wrote "dumb question" ;) But i can tell you about the "debian" way. Every package needs a "sponsor" to get into the unstable tree. Nightly wont get into the tree, only releases. But Michael has more experience in building deb packages, so im looking forward for his answer ;) If he implements a nightly build for .deb packages, i can adapt it for ubuntu. Regards Til ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ OpenXPKI-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openxpki-devel
