Hi Alex, Hi all, On Tuesday, July 10, 2007 12:10 PM Alexander Klink wrote
> just saw your 1006 checkin. I believe we should stick to our naming > conventions and name activities as "lowercase_verb" all over the > place instead of renaming them to I18N tags. If they need to be > translated on the web interface, so be it, but that is part of the > interface and not the server. Internally, they are more or less code, > so I do not really like calling execute_workflow_activity with I18N > identifiers. > Can we please agree to do the translation of those needed (which are > not all anyways, many of them are in autorun states and not visible > to the user at all, some are not reachable via the web interface) on > the interface and not the configuration files? I believe it makes the > config files much more readable, too. I agree that the right way is to change interfaces so that activity names do not appear as button titles. De facto activities in workflow_def_certificate_signing_request.xml have I18N names in cases those activities are not in "auto" states. I just made the same thing for CRR (e.g. no changes for create_crr and persist_crr ). Well, de jure we have to stick our conventions (sorry to violate, ready to roll back) or change them ;-). Best regards, Petr Grigoriev. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ OpenXPKI-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openxpki-devel
