> > Can we please agree to do the translation of those needed (which are
> > not all anyways, many of them are in autorun states and not visible
> > to the user at all, some are not reachable via the web interface) on
> > the interface and not the configuration files? I believe it makes the
> > config files much more readable, too.
>
> I agree that the right way is to change interfaces so that activity names
> do not appear as button titles.
Fine :-)
> De facto activities in workflow_def_certificate_signing_request.xml have
> I18N names in cases those activities are not in "auto" states.
Right, but that is just "for historical reasons", because noone bothered
to rewrite them yet.
> Well, de jure we have to stick our conventions (sorry to violate, ready to
> roll back)
> or change them ;-).
;-) Rolling back would be appreciated. If you or someone else can find
the time to change the others to match our conventions, that would be
even more appreciated ...
All the best ...
Alex
--
Dipl.-Math. Alexander Klink | IT-Security Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | working @ urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.11417
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
OpenXPKI-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openxpki-devel
