Will Tatam wrote: > Out of interest I see almost everyone seems to be running ejabberd these > days, this because they have had issues with jabberd14 or jabberd2 or > just gone for ejabberd due to it's scaling options, should that be > required ?
Never managed to get any of the jabberd's working the way I want it to work. ejabberd also appears to perform better in environments where memory is limited. -- Richard
