Hi, sure, I'll just clean it up/dust it off a little and push it to github or something, as soon as possible.
Ben On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:23, Peter Viskup <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ben, > would it be possible to see the source code of this application? > It would be much better to contact Peter Saint-Andre [stpeter<at>stpeter.im] > to get quicker response. > > Best regards, > -- > Peter Viskup > > On 11/20/2011 10:50 AM, Ben Zimmer wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'l try to sum up the status as of now: >> >> I built an little application, that should make it a lot easier to >> process new list-applications in the future, as it automates some of >> the steps necessary to verify a new server. >> At the moment it has the following features: >> >> * form for server-admins to register their servers >> * automatic sending of verification-email with verification-link to >> proove email-address is real >> * basic check if server is reachable >> * check for SRV-records >> * check for StartTLS/SSL (this is a bit unreliable at the moment and >> would have to be improved) >> * export of list ready to import into the current >> wordpress-table-format on xmpp.org >> >> I asked if this application could be deployed to the server that hosts >> xmpp.org so that it could be integrated in to the page >> (http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/operators/2011-September/001219.html). >> No answer on that so far. >> >> Regarding the list itself and new applications to it: >> We processed all new applications (until today) into this application >> and also marked old, non-responding server as not-verified there. I >> exported the updated list and imported it to the xmpp-wordpress. >> After this I asked if somebody could approve this and make it public, >> but as of now, nobody did (see >> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/operators/2011-September/001220.html). >> No reaction to this so far. >> >> The update doesn't include new applications, because email and >> xmpp-address verification is still to be done here. For this purpose >> there was a blogpost planned to inform people about a (mass) email to >> be sent out and from which email this would come to prevent >> misunderstandings (we cannot use a xmpp.org email-address). >> >> I prepared this blogpost and sent out a request for it to be >> proof-read >> (http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/operators/2011-September/001218.html), >> again without any reaction. >> >> That's about it. >> Ben >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 22:15, Marco Cirillo<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I think I last mailed asking about it, about 1 month ago... >>> But time is still ticking and there's no visible progress. >>> >>> And at the cost of wearing a "Troll Mask". >>> >>> I'd like to know exactly what's the real _showstopper_ here. >>> I think I discussed the same argument with Ludovic one month ago, he >>> hoped >>> as I did that within October this would get sorted. >>> >>> But I reluctantly observe that it's always just a few responses then back >>> to >>> the initial Void. >>> I'd firmly appreciate that the answer isn't:<< time>>; because, aside >>> unacceptable, it would be astonishing. >>> >>> If there's really an objective issue in achieving this *task*, I guess >>> it's >>> really time to _discuss_ about it. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Marco >
