-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/29/13 12:25 PM, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Jonas Wielicki > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> There is cipher suites with forward secrecy. For me on Fedora, > this means diffie-hellman, as elliptic curves are still > problematic[2] (and I'm not yet sure whether they're to trust, but > I guess, noone is). I wonder whether this is considered okay? > > I thought (possibly wrongly) that all PFS suites were based around > a DH exchange, whether EC or not. Correct -- forward secrecy (I don't call it "perfect") isn't tied to elliptic curves. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJScAODAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pJ18P/Rh4hS6DhoojnaCoO1ZbEBsi 0UK5Va35qdo4QQAE1SDqBCl2h4a9AAcMwETyrBDchO8J5uwDyPVFL/Yuye1rb4yk CLZFjSC7epATmR4v9BRpd1zmke5QYWgVmael7GO7AqOFSd4LEsgJ50hrVnTVrD56 cqFwNCPm/jwAs7h9Cr2qE5K3lvVQgQBIXHB73Jt6Lt3IqBquwS6IOH2cA1dPWcFr Up7kmVeRyx6NtiiduoTMydzMbD9AtRJhETqj9AH41B4ht4F31PnL2uBc4rPbBL4D Z17Qx+rmMyNpAEldVehCuY4CH2Fc2IwjLIrmDliMhwcEfzJH5+eEHzso52fUHQnw 6pYvoCLNUyAwdRqXBm8fhIfaRTwxofPVrFPq3CZbnCeUMdIWWgnPOD7L5VAs8nyg BFpKURzziDI50ptLCNFPok6EveRotZux/KcilDuY8gAGOQZyG6keSBHMY6ajSWbM QZHt6eThwk7jG2+WZsLq4LkcmnKIfKk/vPM3dO9YKlvcai0ypwRa7BF7zsjKmFwl VfaO2lR/lBtdEZF9q2pB0V718c2nf0A1yEKdGeolEDifqSklN3D2FvXYOilPmHMk O1XKpoufR5zJJv7Aa+wwEDfkPe4qcOlpskCqoBB4K1tx6kFAKylplb5eGOW5Q/Cw POgBh223lWNBhOrm/Qj/ =vhci -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
