-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/22/13 2:50 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> However, I stress - the point, to me, of the 4th January test is > not to cut connections to Google, or send some Message, or anything > else along those lines. > > The point is to see what happens, accepting there will be some > disruption, and accepting that we may have to re-examine what we > think is achievable here. Yes, that's the idea. We'll never make progress if we don't try. Already, the new xmpp.net service (thanks to Thijs!) has led to security improvements across the XMPP network. IMHO the test days will lead to further improvements (e.g., by isolating which software implementations and deployed services are lacking in various features or are misconfigured). Ideally, Google would decide to either shut off federation with the XMPP network entirely or at least support unauthenticated TLS for server-to-server connections. The limbo we're in is unfortunate. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSnMqMAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pu+kQAImsMm7q12DYVaO6bZf37rgK M6QEqhENkb1CCO8r4/GuEmNlj2eiiNSwGfyQP8c5tLweN0sWbSH4xXxTiqiUC+a9 UQ76kjOkmXjLb67l2wC1dxHL0JBZgUw2LpaIA7QEVBv88hXV47bMQkLKH5fRfSoi EJXd576bBrqS/xcXgFzMqE/mXOLYB123WjJQWZyxsM70f/APcNPOdXR0lQEcFLlZ Wa5YHXr8HkL03cTY5CkVCFtmSW3OtKO9chm3wHc+hM31tXocwfL/maZo8egKXAka NBj+3eaciJFoZ+52F5nzmmVJavvsjFCYttT6rwgL589pv79H/hKX3SJ/fRKZsYNL 8LCtCrqZ/vtFwYZop9PXPxbEPY5N3CAthmXLwOJU9XZeYr0h42QP+RxO+UGUKAT/ MBPAl+XZNo4NWJ8mXucaIpPuvyfqpHlTpa1Mi5iQY0BGSFWuJH6yex2JMukCuQcX ikXWVrFpwhd2TN7HYTDT4EQjyIHgqf7vlM+adp2zthW2eKv1rscBkVGKyGYsQJwy 69diktB5KUVVZOVXoXUx8TG/5t/DGCr1AcmQHNFcavQT77pmCduutlRA8g5SiUsA tOZLoIIOow1F2SQEcBWg/KO/WKXKDQF0CDdzY4x+LhQamBjCd/szySMa9oX4lBLJ mYJqBnRRE0+432qKI9vy =l0Uj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
