-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/4/13 6:56 AM, Alexander Holler wrote: > Am 04.12.2013 14:05, schrieb Ralph Meijer: > >> Alternatively, it makes total sense to use a different protocol >> on PANs and/or LANs and then bridge it to XMPP for WAN transport. >> For example, Peter Waher is working on bridging MQTT and XMPP, >> and MQTT also has a special profile for sensor networks based on >> non-TCP/IP settings, like Zigbee. > > I would prefer to make a clean cut and to develop something like > XMPP 2.0
Folks, this list is for operators of XMPP services. If we're going to design XMPP 2.0, let's please do it on the [email protected] list: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSnzp9AAoJEOoGpJErxa2pzZQQAJXmIjaI0Cz0Tb7MxivIk0Tl j9hLncsF2cayDeMMxrjYdUEb0pwme3lqywQnmwgEffyMMmc+9YlxPJ75iuksnBSn 45NyHGor5k1Dt9iN+w5BHB6Ttfn90/+81KbIK1XC6PSbc7Ne0k5nf04MHqztmGKt 2emf0eom56Zt9j+p6m6EcKAIT83mBmwlZJB3PTjUkUQc+qKKMiTdgO4DfrK3oX71 v0AuxAwX5gzrv6Kip/k+BGm70yhbyz4AdrWjpzIFBuXg/8ZyrZFWOFyejUOGczNF kEJxqoT8+Dt41CEo6xjni8dv14d0/u5XIR8nLqPDo+eATI3c2DfOA0Ydvz0zou8M RRSn0WabJy7qy8hLvQ86GxMQTK5zEYfD3vRZj+zu3bq3D9+rNGSxiompXRbN8eyy euQPJaD41uFcg4T4ds/qEX5q/p6RzyDObrObeKjytwTMHg6my5Dkn6DNtEaYuZ3v Fk/1MVMwK/ZCQqCANuTNGkFGiLrlGcQxWsewV9JU71EuGBUen6w3fr06ZPiUmPbd Flxf7D6z2SSevd8C9pCW+6nQ2Hp38XIgiepCEFQCUe7npDPr2zP/UWK42PlClCMM qy5gNEJjEAxw+G5ibLb+VYUr0AIKXPZwSMS8okzg/kR0wQI6w25o+jNPzV1jS8Pe 3hCKpo+tzbfVCWQI+Bdo =KwlC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
