Am 03.12.2013 17:11, schrieb Alexander Holler:
Am 03.12.2013 15:11, schrieb Matthew Wild:

I'm not saying that XMPP is the best fit for all M2M applications, but
I definitely don't agree that it's inherently a poor fit either as you
suggest.

Sorry, but you just missed my point. I haven't written anything about
traffic or bandwidth, the problem is the need for the parser itself.

So I didn't mean traffic or bandwidth overhead, but code overhead.

Writing and verifying the correct operation of an XMPP-server is
anything but trivial. And M2M is something where usually no admin is
around which can restart a server or even fix bugs.

So to conclude, it's usually a bad idea to tread a machine like some user device which runs a xmpp-client where nobody does care a lot if the client or the device itself crashes.

Alexander Holler

Reply via email to