Two things I don't understand here... 1. Why is that comment classified as "XMPP bashing"? His arguments are valid (Skype, and I could personally think of a few more examples, as a *service* IS more user-friendly than any XMPP-based service, especially if you want more than text chatting). 2. While the article itself was very interesting, why is the comment interesting to the operators group? This looks like neighborhood wars, where "the bros" are called to arms to pick on the guy from a different neighborhood who's passing by and saying this neighborhood is less colorful than his own.
Opinion should not be forced upon people, but rather accepted and respected, unless offensive. Claudiu -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel Pocock Sent: luni, 3 februarie 2014 13:37 To: XMPP Operators Group Subject: [Operators] XMPP bashing Maybe somebody would like to reply to this: http://danielpocock.com/comment/11366#comment-11366
