Claudiu Curcă: > 1. Why is that comment classified as "XMPP bashing"?
As far as I know Daniel is mostly an SIP guy and is trying to _help_ the XMPP community by pointing to that comment. But I also do not think that the comment is "bashing" anything. > why is the comment interesting to the operators group? The comment states that XMPP "lacks a protocol-level acknowledge and I've seen it loose messages regularly when running through flaky proxy" It certainly is possible to reply to that without taking up arms. Cheers, Andreas
