On 08/10/15 16:15, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote: > On 10/8/15 7:02 AM, Mike Barnes wrote: >> I was looking at the possibility of setting up a functional equivalent >> to it in a couple of weeks anyway, but using the actual code would >> make that trivial. I'd be really happy to run a mirror of it in >> Australia. > > Yes, in the longer term I would like us (me and Thijs) to document how > the service is built so that it can be mirrored. It's not that > complicated and it would be great to have the operation of the service > be more open anyway!
That would also be interesting if you want your own instance to test your own servers without e.g. the rate limiting. Looking forward to that. Edwin
