Howdy one and all!
I ran across this public dataset that may be useful to the OPM project?
http://www.rmotc.doe.gov/datasets.html
https://www.ppdm.org/work-groups/teapot-dome
As well as an industry standard referred to as PPDM; which I know
nothing about and would be most curious to for folks to discuss
PPDM relevance to the OPM project efforts? Not suggesting anything
here, I just need to read about many things to figure out where this
old simulation hack needs to focus (besides the ebuild on Gentoo).
Are there any other subsurface physics standards bodies floating around,
that might be interested in some neutrally defined data standards? I
would think the SPE (Society of Petroleum Engineers) would have some
effort in this area?
Thinking outloud, it would seems to me that it would be an excellent
idea for an open source project, such as OPM, to follow industry
conventions, where convenient, particularly if one intends to ask for
support (funding) from some deep-pocketed folks?
Surely PPDM or something similar is a precursor to standardizing how
datasets are prepared, maintained, refined and shared? PPDM might not
be the greatest approach to dataset management and standardization for
subsurface model creation, simulation, and history matching against
production data?
I seed lots of interest in CO2 (carbon sequestration) related to OPM.
Very cool. Anyone have any interest in CO2 flooding (enhanced recovery)
as a hybrid approach to enhanced oil recovery and carbon sequestration
combined into a common goal or set of tools?
curiously,
James
_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
