On 2014-07-02 21:12, wireless wrote:
I ran across this public dataset that may be useful to the OPM
project? https://www.ppdm.org/work-groups/teapot-dome
It requires a PPDM membership to download, so I am not sure it qualifies
as public.
As well as an industry standard referred to as PPDM; which I know
nothing about and would be most curious to for folks to discuss PPDM
relevance to the OPM project efforts?
To me it doesn't seem like PPDM contains petrophysical properties
necessary to do simulation; what is the field from which one can infer
porosity, for instance?
I would think the SPE (Society of Petroleum Engineers) would have
some effort in this area?
There should be various SPE benchmark studies available for download. If
you want to study CO2 storage there is the IGEMS dataset. And, as
mentioned before there is the Norne case (doi:10.2118/127538-MS).
I seed lots of interest in CO2 (carbon sequestration) related to
OPM. Very cool. Anyone have any interest in CO2 flooding (enhanced
recovery) as a hybrid approach to enhanced oil recovery and carbon
sequestration combined into a common goal or set of tools?
Yes, we (Uni Research) are for instance in a project with Aker Solutions
and Statoil where exactly this is a component which is investigated.
(Due to the time frame of the project, OPM is not used as a simulator
there).
--
Roland.
_______________________________________________
Opm mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
