Sorry; my reply went off the wrong way:
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Joakim Hove <[email protected]> Date: Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:42 PM Subject: Re: [OPM] How static are wells? / How to get the union of the well connectivities To: Markus Blatt <[email protected]> > 1. Given a specific well, might the perforated cells change from one > timestep to another? I do suspect this, but would appreciate a > comment. > Yes - during the simulation more perforated cells can be added. Neither wells nor perforations can go away, however they can close - and I guess that from your point of view that more or less amounts to going away? > > 2. As we need to acquire some memory that is hard to estimate > beforehand. Is there a way to aquire a reasonable upper bound > for the number of wells and the number of perforated cells of each. > Well; the EclipseState object knows all of this. Disregarding the possibility of closed wells and connections it would just be the: TotalConnections = \sum_{well}( number_of_connections( well ) ) Where the set of wells are evaluated at the last report step. If you need to take the possibility of closed wells & connections into account you would need to iterate a bit more over the EclipseState::Schedule::Wells structure - but it is all there. J
_______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
