Hi all: Thanks Bryan for driving this discussion. Before, we have down a lot of work for the dovetail, and we also have met many issues. This time, the dovetail will start with the D release-based compliance. It will give us new chance to rethink the dovetail approaches and give us more time to plan the dovetail to make it released. The structure will be reshaped. Welcome to join the dovetail discussion.
Best regards hongbo 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 SULLIVAN, BRYAN L 发送时间: 2017年2月21日 0:46 收件人: [email protected] 主题: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Dovetail] Inputs for Dovetail Principles and Priorities Hi all, To help us move forward on Dovetail I’ve suggested that we first take a step back and consider/agree upon some basics that will I think help us focus the Dovetail effort more effectively. https://techdiscuss.opnfv.org/t/organizing-dovetail/82 was started for that overall goal. Because it’s unclear to me exactly what tool the team prefers to use (and what may be the most effective tool) for such input/discussion/consensus, I’ve suggested that we use a variety of tools as need be, for the various aspects of this discussion. Here’s a summary and links: For example, I submitted https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/DOVETAIL-345 to help us “drive consensus on the high-level test areas for the program to address, first release and as a roadmap”. But whether JIRA is a useful enough tool to develop that consensus in detail is TBD. So when Lincoln asked the question “ how to drive this collaboration / input” in that JIRA issue, I responded with the below: I don't think that https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Test+Areas+and+Test+Cases covers the priorities at the right level. I would rather have a fresh look at this, using a collaborative-editing tool ala Etherpad or a threaded conversation tool ala https://techdiscuss.opnfv.org/. I have for example created a couple of sub-pads of https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/dovetail to start the discussion: * https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/dovetail-principles * https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/dovetail-priorities Discussing such a set of views in a threaded conversation can get very difficult to follow. But any aspects of this that are controversial should be discussed in https://techdiscuss.opnfv.org/ as discrete topics first, and we can agree on the etherpad to take the discussion there as needed. I’d like to get your opinions on this as a more useful way to organize the discussion (and of course, your active participation in the discussion!), i.e.: * We use JIRA to manage the things we need to agree upon * Collaboratively edit an etherpad page related to the subject * If aspects of what the etherpad covers need a deeper/threaded discussion, we can note that on the etherpad and move the discussion to https://techdiscuss.opnfv.org/ until we have consensus, which we can then document on the etherpad * Once we have reached an adequate set of consensus points, we document this in the JIRA issue and close it. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan | AT&T
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
