Hi Luke, We should of course keep your test case and if you had time or anyone who wants to take it, we could try to make it run on other installers as well. We have now an abstraction layer to connect to the deployed nodes regardless of the installer, we could probably adapt the code to use it and make it “installer agnostic”. There are also a few things I’d like to expect from the test case as Functest has evolved, it would be great that the test case adapts to it.
How will be your availability for Euphrates? If you don’t have much time maybe we could propose it as an intern project. Regards, Jose From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Luke Hinds Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 09:36 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] Security Scanning Hi Functest'ers, I am aware I have not been as active on security scanning as I originally hoped, largely due to being v-busy working on upstream. I have also not seen much uptake in contributions from others or any requests for support or enhancements to make from operators / users of OPNFV. With the above snippet in mind, would you like to revisit the projects use in functest? I am not saying I wish to decommission, as I put quite a good number of hours into the code, but at the same time I am aware my contributions have not been very active and I am not sure if that will change in the foreseeable future. You might see otherwise and like to enhance it further, so it seems a discussion could be worthwhile. If you would like we could have this as a topic on a functest meeting or alternately I will be at the plugfest too. Cheers, Luke
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
