On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:45 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <[email protected]> wrote:
> Security scanning is very important, and I would like to extend it to open > source license scanning, etc. this should be part of CI and Functest. Let's > talk about how we can keep this group and its work moving forward. > > Hi Bryan, That's still on as an another project, its confusing as it has similar name, but its different. This email is around scanning OpenStack hosts to view levels of hardening compliance which is a scenario used in functest. The other project with Infra-WG is around gate scanning content and code. I don't blame the mix up on you, its from me using confusing naming conventions :) Cheers, Luke > On Apr 3, 2017, at 9:46 AM, Jose Lausuch <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Luke, > > > > We should of course keep your test case and if you had time or anyone who > wants to take it, we could try to make it run on other installers as well. > We have now an abstraction layer to connect to the deployed nodes > regardless of the installer, we could probably adapt the code to use it and > make it “installer agnostic”. There are also a few things I’d like to > expect from the test case as Functest has evolved, it would be great that > the test case adapts to it. > > > > How will be your availability for Euphrates? If you don’t have much time > maybe we could propose it as an intern project. > > > > Regards, > > Jose > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Luke Hinds > *Sent:* Monday, April 03, 2017 09:36 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] Security Scanning > > > > Hi Functest'ers, > > > > I am aware I have not been as active on security scanning as I originally > hoped, largely due to being v-busy working on upstream. I have also not > seen much uptake in contributions from others or any requests for support > or enhancements to make from operators / users of OPNFV. > > > > With the above snippet in mind, would you like to revisit the projects use > in functest? I am not saying I wish to decommission, as I put quite a good > number of hours into the code, but at the same time I am aware my > contributions have not been very active and I am not sure if that will > change in the foreseeable future. You might see otherwise and like to > enhance it further, so it seems a discussion could be worthwhile. > > > > If you would like we could have this as a topic on a functest meeting or > alternately I will be at the plugfest too. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Luke > _______________________________________________ > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists. > opnfv.org_mailman_listinfo_opnfv-2Dtech-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_ > HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OrbtGCluczz9awEKz9Fv7g&m=kulwm6e5kj6VDwhnBiUYW0jmoTZpEY > 657zJRJ1KSQcE&s=_sqLQE-MQAleJ1L7Vn-4WI_egkjCXLnih6PhuZLkyzM&e= > -- Luke Hinds | NFV Partner Engineering | Office of Technology | Red Hat e: [email protected] | irc: lhinds @freenode | m: +44 77 45 63 98 84 | t: +44 12 52 36 2483
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
