Hi Georg,

It's interesting and meaningful that we can get some insights and practices
from OpenStack.
Will you invite them in the coming meeting or next time?

/Julien



Georg Kunz <[email protected]>于2017年5月19日周五 上午5:38写道:

> Hi all,
>
> We are trying very hard to establish processes, guidelines and best
> practices for running the OPNFV certification program - on our own and with
> guidance from C&C. I believe we can much better leverage existing knowledge
> and experience from related communities. In this context, I'd like to make
> a proposal.
>
> As mentioned during last week's call, Jose and I had very insightful
> conversations with the relevant folks from the OpenStack certification
> domain: Catherine Diep (RefStack PTL), Egle Sigler (co-chair Interop
> working group) and Mark Voelker (co-chair Interop working group). We have
> developed a good relationship with them and they are willing and interested
> in sharing their experience in running the OpenStack certification /
> interop program with us.
>
> My proposal: I'd like to invite the aforementioned persons to one or two
> of our project meetings and let them share their experience, best practices
> and guidelines with us. Based on these insights, we can then define, adapt
> and optimize our own processes to suite our needs. The latter is important
> - I don't think we can simply adopt their existing processes, but we should
> learn about why existing processes in the OpenStack domain have evolved to
> their current form. The OpenStack certification program was started in 2013
> and officially launched in 2015 - so there was serious effort and time
> involved. We should try to build upon existing knowledge without having to
> go through the same learning phase as the OpenStack folks.
>
> This requires some thoughtful timing, of course: In the very short term
> future, we need to focus on finalizing the first iteration of the OPNFV
> certification program. My proposal is not intending to undermine this. On
> the contrary. However, the earlier we get additional insight, the better we
> can define our own processes.
>
> I don't want to put this on the agenda for tomorrow's meeting (for obvious
> reasons), but instead discuss this by email.
>
> @Wenjing / Hongbo: can we dedicate a future meeting to such a sharing
> session with the OpenStack folks?
>
> Best regards
> Georg
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Neary [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 9:54 PM
> > To: Cooper, Trevor <[email protected]>; Wenjing Chu
> > <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> > Cc: Tianhongbo <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Fu
> > Qiao <[email protected]>; Leo Wang <[email protected]>;
> > 'Lincoln Lavoie' <[email protected]>; Georg Kunz
> > <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [dovetail] Weekly meeting agenda for May 19
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > My suspicion is that the entire meeting will be taken up with agenda
> items 2
> > and 3 from Wenjing.
> >
> > We need alignment around the test areas, and test case review. We also
> > need to clarify what, if anything, we need to get in terms of guidance
> from
> > C&C. I suggest inverting these agenda items, because the second will take
> > less time than the first.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dave.
> > On 05/18/2017 02:38 PM, Cooper, Trevor wrote:
> > > I would like to propose some topics ... a few minutes for each should
> be
> > > fine to decide if we can defer or need a decision
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -          H/w resources for Dovetail
> > >
> > > -          Dovetail artifact versions and release schemes
> > >
> > > -          Test catalog domains relevant to compliance
> > >
> > > -          Stability test criteria
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > /Trevor
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *From:* Wenjing Chu [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 17, 2017 4:14 PM
> > > *To:* [email protected]
> > > *Cc:* Dave Neary <[email protected]>; Tianhongbo
> > > <[email protected]>; Cooper, Trevor
> > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Fu Qiao
> > > <[email protected]>; Leo Wang <[email protected]>;
> > 'Lincoln
> > > Lavoie' <[email protected]>; Georg Kunz <[email protected]>
> > > *Subject:* [dovetail] Weekly meeting agenda for May 19
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please comment if the following agenda makes sense:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 1.       Welcome new committers and where we need immediate new
> > > contribution and attention
> > >
> > > 2.       Preparation for tsc review on 5/30
> > >
> > > 3.       Ask - what we need to ask from c&c and board? How should we
> > > take on the administrative side of tasks. Also the Danube addendum for
> > 5/22.
> > >
> > > 4.       Naming convention of test cases
> > >
> > > 5.       Vendor lab testing - needs volunteers to sign up beta testers
> > >
> > > 6.       Tagging / releases, offline support
> > >
> > > 7.       Design summit topics
> > >
> > > 8.       Next week: can we still meet at the same time on 5/26 close to
> > > memorial day weekend in US?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > We won't have enough time to cover all the topics in the meeting to
> > > the full extent, but I'm hoping that we will have volunteers who can
> > > take on some of the tasks and make progress.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Wenjing
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
> > Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
> > Ph: +1-978-399-2182 <+1%20978-399-2182> / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
> <+1%20978-799-3338>
> _______________________________________________
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to