Hi, is your test failing because an @Inject of your service fails? I think you can add a timeout to the @Inject, in case you have a rather big setup where the service does take a bit longer to be available after start.
regards, Achim 2017-08-24 10:51 GMT+02:00 Martin Lichtin <[email protected]>: > Sometimes, not always, a Pax test fails with > > org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.tracker.ServiceLookupException: gave up waiting > for service org.ops4j.pax.exam.ProbeInvokerFactory > at org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.tracker.ServiceLookup. > getService(ServiceLookup.java:161)[304:org.ops4j.pax. > swissbox.tracker:1.8.2] > at org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.tracker.ServiceLookup. > getService(ServiceLookup.java:104)[304:org.ops4j.pax. > swissbox.tracker:1.8.2] > at org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.tracker.ServiceLookup. > getService(ServiceLookup.java:87)[304:org.ops4j.pax. > swissbox.tracker:1.8.2] > at org.ops4j.pax.exam.raw.extender.intern.Parser. > createInvoker(Parser.java:79)[296:org.ops4j.pax.exam. > extender.service:4.11.0] > at org.ops4j.pax.exam.raw.extender.intern.Parser.make( > Parser.java:68)[296:org.ops4j.pax.exam.extender.service:4.11.0] > at org.ops4j.pax.exam.raw.extender.intern.Parser.<init>( > Parser.java:54)[296:org.ops4j.pax.exam.extender.service:4.11.0] > at org.ops4j.pax.exam.raw.extender.intern.TestBundleObserver. > addingEntries(TestBundleObserver.java:69)[296:org.ops4j.pax.exam. > extender.service:4.11.0] > at org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender.BundleWatcher$3.run( > BundleWatcher.java:226)[301:org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender:1.8.2] > at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter. > call(Executors.java:511)[:1.8.0_141] > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask. > java:266)[:1.8.0_141] > at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ > ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor. > java:180)[:1.8.0_141] > at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ > ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)[:1.8.0_141] > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker( > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)[:1.8.0_141] > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run( > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)[:1.8.0_141] > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)[:1.8.0_141] > > Any ideas what could be wrong? In case it is a timing issue, which timeout > parameter would that be? > > - Martin > > -- > -- > ------------------ > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OPS4J" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Apache Member Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
