Okay, I have created https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-891 I'll try to 
take a look at it the nex days..
It seems the logic has already changed in PaxExam-5 for this, if you want 
you can try our latest snapshot build?


Am Mittwoch, 30. August 2017 12:36:04 UTC+2 schrieb Martin Lichtin:
>
> Thanks, but unfortunately that setting has no effect in this situation.
>
> Parser.createInvoker calls
>
>     public static <T> T getService( BundleContext bc, Class<T> type, 
> Map<String, String> props )
>     {
>         return getService( bc, type, DEFAULT_TIMEOUT, props );
>     }
>
> and that DEFAULT_TIMEOUT is set to 10 seconds.
>
> On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 3:42:01 PM UTC+2, [email protected] 
> wrote:
>>
>> This can happen when your test-container is under stress e.g init several 
>> things after startup. You can define a system-property 
>> 'pax.exam.service.timeout' with a value of e.g. 30000 to wait longer.  
>> using systemProperty() option.
>>
>> Am Sonntag, 27. August 2017 17:17:08 UTC+2 schrieb Martin Lichtin:
>>>
>>> Actually no, the @Injects are all ok, also they all have a 60s timeout 
>>> on it.
>>>
>>> From the stacktrace you can see it's hitting an pax-exam internal 10s 
>>> timeout.
>>>
>>> Parser.createInvoker calls ServiceLookup.getService(ctx, 
>>> org.ops4j.pax.exam.ProbeInvokerFactory.class)
>>> That getService method waits up to 10 seconds for the 
>>> "ProbeInvokerFactory" service.
>>>
>>> Would you understand what could cause a delay for that service to become 
>>> registered?
>>>
>>> - Martin
>>>
>>> On Saturday, August 26, 2017 at 8:15:49 AM UTC+2, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi, 
>>>>
>>>> is your test failing because an @Inject of your service fails?
>>>> I think you can add a timeout to the @Inject, in case you have a rather 
>>>> big setup where the service does take a bit longer to be available after 
>>>> start. 
>>>>
>>>> regards, Achim
>>>>
>>>> 2017-08-24 10:51 GMT+02:00 Martin Lichtin <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Sometimes, not always, a Pax test fails with
>>>>>
>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.tracker.ServiceLookupException: gave up waiting 
>>>>> for service org.ops4j.pax.exam.ProbeInvokerFactory
>>>>>     at 
>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.tracker.ServiceLookup.getService(ServiceLookup.java:161)[304:org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.tracker:1.8.2]
>>>>>     at 
>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.tracker.ServiceLookup.getService(ServiceLookup.java:104)[304:org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.tracker:1.8.2]
>>>>>     at 
>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.tracker.ServiceLookup.getService(ServiceLookup.java:87)[304:org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.tracker:1.8.2]
>>>>>     at 
>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.exam.raw.extender.intern.Parser.createInvoker(Parser.java:79)[296:org.ops4j.pax.exam.extender.service:4.11.0]
>>>>>     at 
>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.exam.raw.extender.intern.Parser.make(Parser.java:68)[296:org.ops4j.pax.exam.extender.service:4.11.0]
>>>>>     at 
>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.exam.raw.extender.intern.Parser.<init>(Parser.java:54)[296:org.ops4j.pax.exam.extender.service:4.11.0]
>>>>>     at 
>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.exam.raw.extender.intern.TestBundleObserver.addingEntries(TestBundleObserver.java:69)[296:org.ops4j.pax.exam.extender.service:4.11.0]
>>>>>     at 
>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender.BundleWatcher$3.run(BundleWatcher.java:226)[301:org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender:1.8.2]
>>>>>     at 
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)[:1.8.0_141]
>>>>>     at 
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)[:1.8.0_141]
>>>>>     at 
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)[:1.8.0_141]
>>>>>     at 
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)[:1.8.0_141]
>>>>>     at 
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)[:1.8.0_141]
>>>>>     at 
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)[:1.8.0_141]
>>>>>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)[:1.8.0_141]
>>>>>
>>>>> Any ideas what could be wrong? In case it is a timing issue, which 
>>>>> timeout parameter would that be?
>>>>>
>>>>> - Martin
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> ------------------
>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> --- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>>
>>>> Apache Member
>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> 
>>>> Committer & Project Lead
>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>>>>
>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master 
>>>>
>>>>

-- 
-- 
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to