I will have a look at the WhiteboardR7JaxRsIntegrationTest.

Am Freitag, 13. Oktober 2017 13:30:56 UTC+2 schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek:
>
> Hello
>
> I just pushed changes to master branch - it's now at version 
> 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT. All tests pass except usual  
> org.ops4j.pax.web.itest.undertow.WhiteboardR7JaxRsIntegrationTest and 
> similar in Jetty.
>
> master branch is now "pax web 7" == R7 spec
> 6.0.x branch is maintenance branch (used currently in Karaf 4.x)
> 6.1.x branch is new "pax web 6", where I've added Undertow XML support - 
> no release yet here - I'll write documentation and prepare a release soon 
> (with a notice)
>
> regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> W dniu wtorek, 12 września 2017 13:23:30 UTC+2 użytkownik Grzegorz Grzybek 
> napisał:
>>
>> OK, branch 
>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/commits/pax-web-6.1.x is 
>> ready - I started it again from current pax-web-6.0.x, so your Tomcat 
>> changes are already there.
>>
>> regards
>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>
>> 2017-09-12 13:11 GMT+02:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <[email protected] 
>> <javascript:>>:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-09-12 12:53 GMT+02:00 Stephan Siano <[email protected] 
>>> <javascript:>>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Gregorsz,
>>>>
>>>> I can also pick my changes into that branch (I had have already a local 
>>>> change for this). I would not squash the commits too much (at least the 
>>>> JIRA tasks that are in the history should be identifiable).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks - I also prefer NOT to squash commits. Let me just merge/ff the 
>>> branch to 6.1.x, ok?
>>>
>>> regards
>>> Grzegorz
>>>
>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Stephan
>>>>
>>>> Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017 07:52:58 UTC+2 schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for answer. I left the branch pax-web-6.1.x-proposal for a 
>>>>> while to get answer: to squash commits or to not squash.
>>>>> I'll look again today (or tomorrow), write a doc about new Undertow 
>>>>> configuration and look at merging PAXWEB-1075 and PAXWEB-1129.
>>>>>
>>>>> best regards
>>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-09-12 7:36 GMT+02:00 Stephan Siano <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also think it is a good idea to have a pax-web 6.1.x release with 
>>>>>> some updated references. I would also like to have the update to Tomcat 
>>>>>> 8.5.20 in that branch (PAXWEB-1129) and I would also like to pick the 
>>>>>> additional integration tests for Tomcat (PAXWEB-1075).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the status of the pax-web-6.1.x-proposal branch? Should I 
>>>>>> merge the tomcat changes there? For some reason I don't understand the 
>>>>>> jetty integration tests fail in my local build from that branch (the 
>>>>>> tomcat 
>>>>>> und undertow integration tests work).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>> Stephan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am Montag, 4. September 2017 14:03:29 UTC+2 schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm almost done with PAXWEB-1103 (XML configuration for Undertow) 
>>>>>>> and it looks like this can no longer be considered a micro change.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wanted to ask you if we can do this:
>>>>>>>  – create new branch pax-web-6.1.x out of current 6.0.x from which 
>>>>>>> version 6.1.0 could be released soon (including PAXWEB-1103)
>>>>>>>  – have pax-web-6.0.x branch as is for 6.0.x maintenance
>>>>>>>  – bump version to 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT in master branch (to reflect work 
>>>>>>> on R7 spec)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>> -- 
>>>> ------------------
>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] <javascript:>
>>>>
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

-- 
-- 
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to