Hi, Just a dumb question: Who can set up a build job for the pax-web-6.1.x branch?
Best regards Stephan Am Freitag, 13. Oktober 2017 22:37:23 UTC+2 schrieb Achim Nierbeck: > > Thanks, looks fine for me :) > > 2017-10-13 13:30 GMT+02:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <[email protected] > <javascript:>>: > >> Hello >> >> I just pushed changes to master branch - it's now at version >> 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT. All tests pass except usual >> org.ops4j.pax.web.itest.undertow.WhiteboardR7JaxRsIntegrationTest and >> similar in Jetty. >> >> master branch is now "pax web 7" == R7 spec >> 6.0.x branch is maintenance branch (used currently in Karaf 4.x) >> 6.1.x branch is new "pax web 6", where I've added Undertow XML support - >> no release yet here - I'll write documentation and prepare a release soon >> (with a notice) >> >> regards >> Grzegorz Grzybek >> >> >> W dniu wtorek, 12 września 2017 13:23:30 UTC+2 użytkownik Grzegorz >> Grzybek napisał: >>> >>> OK, branch >>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/commits/pax-web-6.1.x is >>> ready - I started it again from current pax-web-6.0.x, so your Tomcat >>> changes are already there. >>> >>> regards >>> Grzegorz Grzybek >>> >>> 2017-09-12 13:11 GMT+02:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <[email protected] >>> <javascript:>>: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2017-09-12 12:53 GMT+02:00 Stephan Siano <[email protected] >>>> <javascript:>>: >>>> >>>>> Hi Gregorsz, >>>>> >>>>> I can also pick my changes into that branch (I had have already a >>>>> local change for this). I would not squash the commits too much (at least >>>>> the JIRA tasks that are in the history should be identifiable). >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks - I also prefer NOT to squash commits. Let me just merge/ff the >>>> branch to 6.1.x, ok? >>>> >>>> regards >>>> Grzegorz >>>> >>>> >>>>> Best regards >>>>> Stephan >>>>> >>>>> Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017 07:52:58 UTC+2 schrieb Grzegorz >>>>> Grzybek: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for answer. I left the branch pax-web-6.1.x-proposal for a >>>>>> while to get answer: to squash commits or to not squash. >>>>>> I'll look again today (or tomorrow), write a doc about new Undertow >>>>>> configuration and look at merging PAXWEB-1075 and PAXWEB-1129. >>>>>> >>>>>> best regards >>>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2017-09-12 7:36 GMT+02:00 Stephan Siano <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I also think it is a good idea to have a pax-web 6.1.x release with >>>>>>> some updated references. I would also like to have the update to Tomcat >>>>>>> 8.5.20 in that branch (PAXWEB-1129) and I would also like to pick the >>>>>>> additional integration tests for Tomcat (PAXWEB-1075). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is the status of the pax-web-6.1.x-proposal branch? Should I >>>>>>> merge the tomcat changes there? For some reason I don't understand the >>>>>>> jetty integration tests fail in my local build from that branch (the >>>>>>> tomcat >>>>>>> und undertow integration tests work). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards >>>>>>> Stephan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am Montag, 4. September 2017 14:03:29 UTC+2 schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm almost done with PAXWEB-1103 (XML configuration for Undertow) >>>>>>>> and it looks like this can no longer be considered a micro change. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I wanted to ask you if we can do this: >>>>>>>> – create new branch pax-web-6.1.x out of current 6.0.x from which >>>>>>>> version 6.1.0 could be released soon (including PAXWEB-1103) >>>>>>>> – have pax-web-6.0.x branch as is for 6.0.x maintenance >>>>>>>> – bump version to 7.0.0-SNAPSHOT in master branch (to reflect work >>>>>>>> on R7 spec) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>>> regards >>>>>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> -- >>>>> ------------------ >>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] <javascript:> >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >> -- >> ------------------ >> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] <javascript:> >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "OPS4J" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > > Apache Member > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & > Project Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> > > Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master > > -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
