Not right now, it's planned for Pax Web version 7.0 ... but requires a lot of changes, next to support for J9.
There is already (a bit stale though) a branch for the switch. We experienced that there are a lot of breaking changes. Regards, Achim 2017-12-18 15:55 GMT+01:00 Bartłomiej Turos <[email protected]>: > Thanks Achim! On a related note, do you guys have rough estimate on when > Jetty 9.4+ would be introduced as Pax-Web dependency? I do realize this > will take some effort :) > > Regards, > Bartek > > W dniu sobota, 16 grudnia 2017 11:24:31 UTC+1 użytkownik Achim Nierbeck > napisał: >> >> Hi Bartek, >> >> with Pax Web you can either use Tomcat or Undertow as alternative for >> Jetty. >> If you want to do so, just make sure you install the feature for it >> before installing the Pax web runtime features. >> >> regards, Achim >> >> 2017-12-14 19:50 GMT+01:00 Bartłomiej Turos <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi everyone. My name is Bartłomiej Turos and I'm working on a project >>> which is based on the ServiceMix (7.0.1). Part of that build is Pax-web, >>> which by default seems to be using Jetty. >>> Due to the following issue: https://github.com/ecli >>> pse/jetty.project/issues/1446 we cannot deploy our product with Jetty >>> 9.2.x inside (this is affecting our users). >>> >>> The issue has been reportedly fixed in Jetty version 9.4.4+, but even >>> the latest version of pax-web seems to be using Jetty 9.3.x. I tried to >>> upgrade Jetty to 9.4.8 by updating relevant jars in ServiceMix installation >>> and relevant pax-web feature descriptor file >>> (pax-web-features-4.3.0-features.xml), >>> but it turned out that Jetty 9.4 has non-backward compatible API changes. >>> >>> I am hoping that I can configure pax-web to use Tomcat instead. I would >>> like to ask some help on configuring Tomcat under pax-web. >>> >>> Also, are there any limitations when working with Tomcat instead of >>> Jetty? >>> >>> If any of this sounds noobish, please forgive me. >>> If there's any documentation / tutorial that has what I probably need, >>> please point me in the right direction. >>> If there's a better way than replacing Tomcat with Jetty, don't hesitate >>> to share. >>> >>> Any help will be greatly appreciate. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Bartek >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> ------------------ >>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Apache Member >> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer >> & Project Lead >> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >> >> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >> >> -- > -- > ------------------ > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OPS4J" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Apache Member Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
