Hi, sorry for the late reply, just one word of waning. If you are still on pax-web 4.x you will probably better stay with the jetty web container. Undertow is only available with pax-web 6.0 and later. The tomcat support is rather incomplete in pax-web 4.x (marked as experimental). The tomcat integration is quite good in pax-web 6.0.9 and will be less or more complete in pax-web 6.1.0 and 6.0.10 (6.1.0 will bring a tomcat 8.5 whereas 6.0.9 is on tomcat 8.0).
Best regards Stephan Am Samstag, 16. Dezember 2017 11:24:31 UTC+1 schrieb Achim Nierbeck: > > Hi Bartek, > > with Pax Web you can either use Tomcat or Undertow as alternative for > Jetty. > If you want to do so, just make sure you install the feature for it before > installing the Pax web runtime features. > > regards, Achim > > 2017-12-14 19:50 GMT+01:00 Bartłomiej Turos <[email protected] > <javascript:>>: > >> Hi everyone. My name is Bartłomiej Turos and I'm working on a project >> which is based on the ServiceMix (7.0.1). Part of that build is Pax-web, >> which by default seems to be using Jetty. >> Due to the following issue: >> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/1446 we cannot deploy >> our product with Jetty 9.2.x inside (this is affecting our users). >> >> The issue has been reportedly fixed in Jetty version 9.4.4+, but even the >> latest version of pax-web seems to be using Jetty 9.3.x. I tried to upgrade >> Jetty to 9.4.8 by updating relevant jars in ServiceMix installation and >> relevant pax-web feature descriptor file >> (pax-web-features-4.3.0-features.xml), but it turned out that Jetty 9.4 has >> non-backward compatible API changes. >> >> I am hoping that I can configure pax-web to use Tomcat instead. I would >> like to ask some help on configuring Tomcat under pax-web. >> >> Also, are there any limitations when working with Tomcat instead of Jetty? >> >> If any of this sounds noobish, please forgive me. >> If there's any documentation / tutorial that has what I probably need, >> please point me in the right direction. >> If there's a better way than replacing Tomcat with Jetty, don't hesitate >> to share. >> >> Any help will be greatly appreciate. >> >> Regards, >> Bartek >> >> -- >> -- >> ------------------ >> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] <javascript:> >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "OPS4J" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > > Apache Member > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & > Project Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> > > Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master > > -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
