On Wednesday 14 February 2018 10:19:01 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote:
> I hope to finish docs this week.
> 
> Just wondering: You should always be able to install a higher API
> version of the logging framework inside your test if needed or why is an
> update required?

Sure, but I would have to add Pax Logging API manually to otherwise generated 
tests (options) as workaround (and remove later again) and therefore prefer to 
fix it upstream.

O.

> Am 13.02.2018 um 14:05 schrieb Oliver Lietz:
> > On Tuesday 13 February 2018 13:02:26 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote:
> >> i'm currently working on docu+tests for the eclipse container, maybe we
> >> can wait for this to include it?
> > 
> > Hi Christoph,
> > 
> > do you have a time frame for this? I'm somewhat blocked by PAXEXAM-914.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > O.
> > 
> >> Am 13.02.2018 um 06:09 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré:
> >>> No yet, but no objection from my side.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Regards
> >>> 
> >>> JB
> >>> 
> >>> On 02/12/2018 11:57 PM, Oliver Lietz wrote:
> >>>> hi all,
> >>>> 
> >>>> are there any release plans for Pax Exam 4.12?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> O.

-- 
-- 
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to