On Wednesday 14 February 2018 10:19:01 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote: > I hope to finish docs this week. > > Just wondering: You should always be able to install a higher API > version of the logging framework inside your test if needed or why is an > update required?
Sure, but I would have to add Pax Logging API manually to otherwise generated tests (options) as workaround (and remove later again) and therefore prefer to fix it upstream. O. > Am 13.02.2018 um 14:05 schrieb Oliver Lietz: > > On Tuesday 13 February 2018 13:02:26 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote: > >> i'm currently working on docu+tests for the eclipse container, maybe we > >> can wait for this to include it? > > > > Hi Christoph, > > > > do you have a time frame for this? I'm somewhat blocked by PAXEXAM-914. > > > > Regards, > > O. > > > >> Am 13.02.2018 um 06:09 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: > >>> No yet, but no objection from my side. > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> > >>> JB > >>> > >>> On 02/12/2018 11:57 PM, Oliver Lietz wrote: > >>>> hi all, > >>>> > >>>> are there any release plans for Pax Exam 4.12? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> O. -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
