I've changed the activator, so the servlet is registered 400ms before the
context - consistently the test passes when invoking the servlet - the new
context is ALWAYS used and I see this in logs:

11:57:22.032 [paxweb-config-1-thread-1] INFO  (HttpServiceEnabled.java:592)
org.ops4j.pax.web.service.internal.HttpServiceEnabled - Unregistering
servlet model
"ServletModel{id=ServletModel-2,name='whiteboard-servlet',urlPatterns=[/wb/*],contexts=[{WB,OCM-1,default,/}]}"
...
11:57:22.039 [main] DEBUG (WhiteboardExtenderContext.java:494)
org.ops4j.pax.web.extender.whiteboard.internal.WhiteboardExtenderContext -
Registering
ServletModel{id=ServletModel-2,name='whiteboard-servlet',urlPatterns=[/wb/*],contexts=[{WB,OCM-5,default,/}]}
*again after its context selection filter matched new set of contexts*

kind regards
Grzegorz Grzybek

wt., 20 wrz 2022 o 11:53 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com> napisał(a):

> Please check the activator I used:
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/commit/c4efc95ebe1e5ecd4d7763f3f04267f9213a845d#diff-c7a6d3e304fd5dd93a853e2d86a1f1ea390f1f1d313691af2854a63b527ccaa4
>
> regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> wt., 20 wrz 2022 o 11:43 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
>
>> Anyway, I've created a Pax Web issue at
>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/issues/1769, so we can
>> continue the discussion there.
>>
>> regards
>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>
>> wt., 20 wrz 2022 o 09:44 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>
>> napisał(a):
>>
>>> Hello Dave
>>>
>>> Your logs are really helpful, I've found (in some.txt) that a servlet
>>> named "com.candatag.repository.servlet.RepoMenu" is registered into OCM-3
>>> (/admin):
>>>
>>> [paxweb-config-1-thread-1] INFO
>>> org.ops4j.pax.web.service.internal.HttpServiceEnabled - Registering
>>> ServletModel{id=ServletModel-9,name='com.candatag.repository.servlet.RepoMenu',urlPatterns=[/repo],contexts=[{WB,OCM-3,com.candatag.web.security.admin.services.AdminWebSecurity,/admin}]}
>>>
>>> but only later this OCM-3 is passed to Jetty:
>>>
>>> [paxweb-config-1-thread-1] INFO
>>> org.ops4j.pax.web.service.jetty.internal.JettyServerController - Receiving
>>> Batch{"Registration of
>>> OsgiContextModel{WB,id=OCM-3,name='com.candatag.web.security.admin.services.AdminWebSecurity',path='/admin',bundle=com.candatag.web.security.admin,ref={org.osgi.service.http.context.ServletContextHelper,
>>> com.candatag.web.security.admin.services.AdminWebSecurity}={service.id=55,
>>> osgi.http.whiteboard.context.name=com.candatag.web.security.admin.services.AdminWebSecurity,
>>> service.bundleid=18, service.scope=bundle, 
>>> component.name=com.candatag.web.security.admin.zoo.impl.AdminContext,
>>> osgi.http.whiteboard.context.path=/admin, component.id=21}}", size=2}
>>> [paxweb-config-1-thread-1] INFO
>>> org.ops4j.pax.web.service.jetty.internal.JettyServerWrapper - Creating new
>>> Jetty context for
>>> ServletContextModel{id=ServletContextModel-12,contextPath='/admin'}
>>> [paxweb-config-1-thread-1] INFO
>>> org.ops4j.pax.web.service.jetty.internal.JettyServerWrapper - Adding
>>> OsgiContextModel{WB,id=OCM-3,name='com.candatag.web.security.admin.services.AdminWebSecurity',path='/admin',bundle=com.candatag.web.security.admin,ref={org.osgi.service.http.context.ServletContextHelper,
>>> com.candatag.web.security.admin.services.AdminWebSecurity}={service.id=55,
>>> osgi.http.whiteboard.context.name=com.candatag.web.security.admin.services.AdminWebSecurity,
>>> service.bundleid=18, service.scope=bundle, 
>>> component.name=com.candatag.web.security.admin.zoo.impl.AdminContext,
>>> osgi.http.whiteboard.context.path=/admin, component.id=21}} to
>>> o.o.p.w.s.j.i.PaxWebServletContextHandler@48beedf5{/admin,null,STOPPED}
>>>
>>> I'll ensure that this doesn't lead to problems.
>>>
>>> I'll check further, bu if you could please set DEBUG log level for
>>> entire "org.ops4j.pax.web" logger and add timestamps, we'd get more
>>> information.
>>>
>>> In server.txt I think everything looks fine though (if I read the DTOs
>>> correctly):
>>>
>>> Servlet Context {"name":"default", "contextPath":"/", ...,
>>> "serviceId":39, "servletDTOs":[{"patterns":["/osgi/started"], ...,
>>> "name":"com.candatag.k8s.zoo.servlet.ReadyProbe", ...], ...}
>>>  - {"patterns":["/osgi/started"], ...,
>>> "name":"com.candatag.k8s.zoo.servlet.ReadyProbe", ...}
>>>
>>> Servlet Context {"name":"default", "contextPath":"/", ...,
>>> "serviceId":0, "servletDTOs":[], ...}
>>>  - <no servlets>
>>>
>>> Servlet Context
>>> {"name":"com.candatag.web.security.admin.services.AdminWebSecurity",
>>> "contextPath":"/admin", ..., "serviceId":40, "servletDTOs":[
>>>  - {"patterns":["/repo/localservice/console/services/view"], ...,
>>> "name":"com.candatag.osgi.console.servlet.ViewService", ...},
>>>  - {"patterns":["/repo/localservice/console/services"], ...,
>>> "name":"com.candatag.osgi.console.servlet.Services", ...},
>>>  - {"patterns":["/repo/localservice/console/services/check"], ...,
>>> "name":"com.candatag.osgi.console.servlet.SystemCheck", ...},
>>>  - {"patterns":["/repo/localservice/console/run"], ...,
>>> "name":"com.candatag.osgi.console.servlet.RunService", }
>>> ], ...}
>>>
>>> so "/osgi/started" servlet is registered to "/" context, which is (from
>>> Whiteboard point of view) "backed" by OCM-3 (serviceId=39) - the one
>>> registered by you, not the default one from pax-web-extender-whiteboard.
>>>
>>> However, in "some.txt", I see what I mentioned - that a servlet
>>> registration is being handled before OCM-3 is processed. Indeed, in code,
>>> the OsgiContextModel is added to Whiteboard internal structures, before
>>> it's passed further. And in between, a servlet may refer to it. Checking.
>>>
>>> regards
>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>>
>>>
>>> pon., 19 wrz 2022 o 21:36 Dave Smith <dave.sm...@candata.com>
>>> napisał(a):
>>>
>>>> Never responds to the GET request.  I have a helper method that
>>>> displays the ServletDTO. It does not show up there either. It does seem to
>>>> be a timing issue.
>>>>
>>>> I have attached a couple of log dumps. The checks of the DTO (They are
>>>> the last lines of the log entries) happen about 10 seconds after the
>>>> container starts.
>>>> In server.txt there is one servlet that gets dropped from the new
>>>> default context
>>>> In some.txt there are 2 servlets that get dropped and then there are 2
>>>> that are registered successfully .
>>>>
>>>>  Dave
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 2:06 PM Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi. See inline
>>>>>
>>>>> pon., 19 wrz 2022 o 20:21 Dave Smith <dave.sm...@candata.com>
>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been doing a little more testing. I have an activator method
>>>>>> like this ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thread context = new Thread(()->{
>>>>>> Hashtable<String, Object> aDic = new Hashtable<>();
>>>>>> aDic.put(HttpWhiteboardConstants.HTTP_WHITEBOARD_CONTEXT_NAME,
>>>>>> "default");
>>>>>> aDic.put(HttpWhiteboardConstants.HTTP_WHITEBOARD_CONTEXT_PATH, "/");
>>>>>> aDic.put(Constants.SERVICE_RANKING,Integer.MAX_VALUE);
>>>>>> ctx.registerService(ServletContextHelper.class, new DefaultContxt(),
>>>>>> aDic);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> });
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);
>>>>>> Thread s2 = new Thread(()->{
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hashtable<String, Object> aDic = new Hashtable<>();
>>>>>> aDic.put(HttpWhiteboardConstants.HTTP_WHITEBOARD_SERVLET_NAME,
>>>>>> "test2");
>>>>>> aDic.put(HttpWhiteboardConstants.HTTP_WHITEBOARD_SERVLET_PATTERN,
>>>>>> "/test2");
>>>>>> ctx.registerService(Servlet.class, new TestServlet("Test 2"), aDic);
>>>>>> latch.countDown();
>>>>>> });
>>>>>>
>>>>>> s2.start();
>>>>>> latch.await();
>>>>>> Thread.sleep(400);
>>>>>> context.start();
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On my machine any value where sleep is <400 the context is always
>>>>>> started first otherwise the servlet gets started first and gets 
>>>>>> unresgtered
>>>>>> and re-registered into the new context. I am guessing it takes longer to
>>>>>> init the servlet and I wonder if the Context is getting updated during 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> servlet init process. (That is what it would seem like from the logs)...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me know if you need any more info ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll check the order of operations tomorrow. The point is that in Pax
>>>>> Web 8 I've created several such tests, including SCR one (
>>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/tree/web-8.0.9/samples/samples-whiteboard/whiteboard-ds
>>>>> - see the readme describing fundamental difficulty with SCR) where 
>>>>> contexts
>>>>> and servlets are registered, but eventually everything is fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> So a question - is your servlet eventually responding to a GET
>>>>> request? Don't just look at the logs for registration/unregistration of 
>>>>> the
>>>>> context. The lines you've sent:
>>>>>
>>>>> Unegistering
>>>>> OsgiServletContext{model=OsgiContextModel{WB,id=OCM-1,name='default',path='/',bundle=org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-extender-whiteboard,context=(supplier)}}
>>>>> as OSGi service for "/" context path
>>>>>
>>>>> Registering
>>>>> OsgiServletContext{model=OsgiContextModel{WB,id=OCM-2,name='default',path='/',bundle=com.candatag.web.util,ref={org.osgi.service.http.context.ServletContextHelper}={
>>>>> service.id=57, osgi.http.whiteboard.context.name=default,
>>>>> service.bundleid=19, service.scope=bundle, service.ranking=2147483647,
>>>>> component.name=com.candatag.web.util.zoo.impl.NoSecurityContextImpl,
>>>>> osgi.http.whiteboard.context.path=/, component.id=22}}} as OSGi
>>>>> service for "/" context path
>>>>>
>>>>> are information that different object of OsgiServletContext class is
>>>>> registered as the OSGi service of javax.servlet.ServletContext interface.
>>>>> This is according to chapter 128.3.4 (
>>>>> https://docs.osgi.org/specification/osgi.cmpn/7.0.0/service.war.html#i3078599)
>>>>> of Web Applications Specification, but has nothing to do with Whiteboard -
>>>>> the underlying Jetty/Tomcat/Undertow context stays started.
>>>>>
>>>>> regards
>>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 12:52 PM Grzegorz Grzybek <
>>>>>> gr.grzy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's all loosely coupled - a "servlet registration" knows the LDAP
>>>>>>> filter (by default "osgi.http.whiteboard.context.select=(
>>>>>>> osgi.http.whiteboard.context.name=default)") for it's contexts. And
>>>>>>> each time the new context is registered, the web elements with matching
>>>>>>> filter are being re-registered.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The fact that you're overriding an "OSGi Context"
>>>>>>> (ServletContextHelper) within the same context path "/" means that the
>>>>>>> servlet context is restarted (because there's higher-ranked
>>>>>>> OsgiServletContext), but the servlet should be simply kept in existing 
>>>>>>> "/"
>>>>>>> ServletContext. I know - lots of contexts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Today I was checking few other
>>>>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/issues, but I remember
>>>>>>> about your scenario - I should have an explanation tomorrow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards
>>>>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> pon., 19 wrz 2022 o 19:42 dave....@candata.com <
>>>>>>> dave.sm...@candata.com> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still trying to get a test case but I do believe it is a threading
>>>>>>>> issue ... What I find strange is the servlet that disappears gets
>>>>>>>> registered like this
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [paxweb-config-1-thread-1] INFO
>>>>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.web.service.internal.HttpServiceEnabled - Registering
>>>>>>>> ServletModel{id=ServletModel-4,name='com.candatag.k8s.zoo.servlet.ReadyProbe',urlPatterns=[/osgi/started],contexts=[{WB,OCM-2,default,/}]}
>>>>>>>> Receiving Batch{"Registration of
>>>>>>>> ServletModel{id=ServletModel-4,name='com.candatag.k8s.zoo.servlet.ReadyProbe',urlPatterns=[/osgi/started],contexts=[{WB,OCM-2,default,/}]}",
>>>>>>>> size=1}
>>>>>>>> Adding servlet
>>>>>>>> ServletModel{id=ServletModel-4,name='com.candatag.k8s.zoo.servlet.ReadyProbe',urlPatterns=[/osgi/started],contexts=[{WB,OCM-2,default,/}]}
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now what is ODD is that OCM-2 is not registered yet!  It follows in
>>>>>>>> the logs
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Receiving Batch{"Registration of
>>>>>>>> OsgiContextModel{WB,id=OCM-2,name='default',path='/',bundle=com.candatag.web.util,ref={org.osgi.service.http.context.ServletContextHelper}={
>>>>>>>> service.id=39, osgi.http.whiteboard.context.name=default,
>>>>>>>> service.bundleid=17, service.scope=bundle, service.ranking=2147483647,
>>>>>>>> component.name=com.candatag.web.util.zoo.impl.NoSecurityContextImpl,
>>>>>>>> osgi.http.whiteboard.context.path=/, component.id=1}}", size=1}
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So how does the servlet know that this new default context is
>>>>>>>> coming?  In my test harness I see the servlet unregistering and then
>>>>>>>> registering again when the context changes...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It looks like we are half pregnant, somebody knows the context is
>>>>>>>> there but it is in an unregistered state so the servlet modal does not 
>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>> attached.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 8:50:28 AM UTC-5
>>>>>>>> dave....@candata.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My other question would be if you are "Unregistering " the default
>>>>>>>>> context should it still show up in the
>>>>>>>>> HttpServiceRuntime.getRuntimeDTO().servletContextDTOs ? It does now
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 8:43:33 AM UTC-5
>>>>>>>>> dave....@candata.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It will be a little tricky to send my whole project in , let me
>>>>>>>>>> see what I can do , however I have reviewed the test cases in the 
>>>>>>>>>> link
>>>>>>>>>> provided and it looks like you are not covering my case ...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I do not see a test where  ...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Register the default handler ->   HttpContext defaultContext = wc
>>>>>>>>>> .createDefaultHttpContext(); , not sure if this also creates a 
>>>>>>>>>> ServletContextHelper
>>>>>>>>>> wrapper as well
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Then create a servlet that attaches to it , but do not call the
>>>>>>>>>> servlet , just check it is added
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Register the default override with a high service ranking .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> See if this happens
>>>>>>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.web.service.spi.servlet.OsgiServletContext -
>>>>>>>>>> Unegistering
>>>>>>>>>> OsgiServletContext{model=OsgiContextModel{WB,id=OCM-1,name='default',path='/'
>>>>>>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.web.service.spi.servlet.OsgiServletContext -
>>>>>>>>>> Registering
>>>>>>>>>> OsgiServletContext{model=OsgiContextModel{WB,id=OCM-2,name='default',path='/',
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And then see if the servlet is in the new context ...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The override testcases seem to all create the override first
>>>>>>>>>> before the first servlet is registered OR you are changing the path 
>>>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>>> default context ...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 8:06 AM Grzegorz Grzybek <
>>>>>>>>>> gr.gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, the initial reason of entire Pax Web 8 refactoring was
>>>>>>>>>>> the context handling - ability to register one servlet into multiple
>>>>>>>>>>> contexts and multiple servlets into one context.
>>>>>>>>>>> There are really lot of integration tests that show exactly this.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd have to see your example and check what's the problem there
>>>>>>>>>>> - you seem to correctly override "default" whiteboard context with 
>>>>>>>>>>> "/" path
>>>>>>>>>>> and higher ranking, so it should work.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/tree/web-8.0.9/samples/samples-whiteboard/whiteboard-ds
>>>>>>>>>>> is and example of SCR registration of multiple web elements and 
>>>>>>>>>>> contexts.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This integration test (
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/web-8.0.9/pax-web-itest/pax-web-itest-server/src/test/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/itest/server/whiteboard/WhiteboardAndHttpServiceTest.java#L198)
>>>>>>>>>>> - overridenDefaultContextsWithWhiteboardServlet() shows how
>>>>>>>>>>> "default" + "/" context is overriden.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Could you please share your project? It can be attached to an
>>>>>>>>>>> issue in https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/issues
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> niedz., 18 wrz 2022 o 14:16 Dave Smith <dave....@candata.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What is the correct way to override the default servlet
>>>>>>>>>>>> context? I am doing this...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> @Component(service = ServletContextHelper.class,property = {
>>>>>>>>>>>> Constants.SERVICE_RANKING+":Integer="+Integer.MAX_VALUE})
>>>>>>>>>>>> @HttpWhiteboardContext(name = "default",path = "/")
>>>>>>>>>>>> public class NoSecurityContextImpl extends ServletContextHelper
>>>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What I am seeing is if a servlet is registered BEFORE the new
>>>>>>>>>>>> default context it just seems to disappear, anything after gets 
>>>>>>>>>>>> put in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> new default. When I call HttpServiceRuntime.servletDTOs I see the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> original
>>>>>>>>>>>> default context with no servlets attached to it and my overridden 
>>>>>>>>>>>> one with
>>>>>>>>>>>> the servlets that were registered after.
>>>>>>>>>>>> failedServletDTOs,failedServletContextDTOs are empty. If I remove 
>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>> override the servlets appear.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What is weird is it looks like the servlet is getting put into
>>>>>>>>>>>> the right context if I read the log correctly ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Registering
>>>>>>>>>>>> ServletModel{id=ServletModel-4,name='com.candatag.k8s.zoo.servlet.ReadyProbe',urlPatterns=[/osgi/started],contexts=[{WB,OCM-2,default,/}]}
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> INFO org.ops4j.pax.web.service.spi.servlet.OsgiServletContext -
>>>>>>>>>>>> Unegistering
>>>>>>>>>>>> OsgiServletContext{model=OsgiContextModel{WB,id=OCM-1,name='default',path='/',bundle=org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-extender-whiteboard,context=(supplier)}}
>>>>>>>>>>>> as OSGi service for "/" context path
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Registering
>>>>>>>>>>>> OsgiServletContext{model=OsgiContextModel{WB,id=OCM-2,name='default',path='/',bundle=com.candatag.web.util,ref={org.osgi.service.http.context.ServletContextHelper}={
>>>>>>>>>>>> service.id=57, osgi.http.whiteboard.context.name=default,
>>>>>>>>>>>> service.bundleid=19, service.scope=bundle, service.ranking=
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2147483647 <(214)%20748-3647>, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> component.name=com.candatag.web.util.zoo.impl.NoSecurityContextImpl,
>>>>>>>>>>>> osgi.http.whiteboard.context.path=/, component.id=22}}} as
>>>>>>>>>>>> OSGi service for "/" context path
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CA%2BFCLu2SbiSKmN7W3-ZQqHLYCA67vF104UCVWtU77-63tcarUA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CA%2BFCLu2SbiSKmN7W3-ZQqHLYCA67vF104UCVWtU77-63tcarUA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhrMU6_5ABFc0oxevK%2BjuZVhOzxdK0cqvyTz6pCWZAM7Yg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhrMU6_5ABFc0oxevK%2BjuZVhOzxdK0cqvyTz6pCWZAM7Yg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>> send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/e972d47a-f8b3-4dec-9ba1-94549e29a250n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/e972d47a-f8b3-4dec-9ba1-94549e29a250n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhqzknu%3DwfrL5d-hWbHe%2BGa%2Bazbx6Yg__OTuC683B8VbMA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhqzknu%3DwfrL5d-hWbHe%2BGa%2Bazbx6Yg__OTuC683B8VbMA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CA%2BFCLu1OssPACzuqNDCpxT3AGz%3DRjarNubJUi%2BPXuog2D0aWMA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CA%2BFCLu1OssPACzuqNDCpxT3AGz%3DRjarNubJUi%2BPXuog2D0aWMA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> --
>>>>> ------------------
>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhrP%3DUawM0_EYyg%2B3NuyMDjz%3DRzqvAP%3D%3DfTkcXUXgJH6jw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhrP%3DUawM0_EYyg%2B3NuyMDjz%3DRzqvAP%3D%3DfTkcXUXgJH6jw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> ------------------
>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CA%2BFCLu3Wm1mXtGYBGHr7MoLpo83%2BQbd0TMHNheKiWii_at-CsQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CA%2BFCLu3Wm1mXtGYBGHr7MoLpo83%2BQbd0TMHNheKiWii_at-CsQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>

-- 
-- 
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhrPvxRF829dtYoEZOLHhj%3DtwJ15VV0KA0SK0jxjZn9ZMw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to