Hello Satoru, Thanks a lot for your comments,
I guess it is not clear in our document, because chapter says. 3. Supporting EAP authencation in Wifi network . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.1. Scenario Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. The scope of definition of split MAC mode . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Section 4 could lead people think that we are only working on the split MAC, actually the local MAC don't need define the scope, we specify both split and local MAC. Thanks again for your kind review. Best regards, -Hui 2012/10/18 Satoru Matsushima <[email protected]> > Hello Hui, > > Looks interesting. My first impression for these drafts is that the > local-mac, another capwap model, has also supported EAP. Why do you need > split-mac for EAP particularly? > > BTW, the right place in the IETF to discuss them would be capwap but it > has already closed. Does the IETF work work CAPWAP stuff again? > > cheers, > --satoru > > > > > Hello OPS > > > > Quite recently, there are large carrier grade wifi deployment because of > mobile Internet data congestion in the air interface. And there become more > strong demand about the successful usage of CAPWAP protocl which is > invented by IETF. It will help operator to deploy more than couple of > millions of Wifi APs, in this case, we have writen drafts about further > work on capwap extension, Hope you could kindly help to review and comment > them, > > > > PS: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shao-capwap-plus-ps/ > > EAP extension > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cao-capwap-eap-00.txt > > Thanks a lot for your kind review. > > Best regards, > > > > -Hui > > > >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
