On 16/01/2013 08:02, Melinda Shore wrote: > On 1/15/13 10:55 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> "Let us assume the probability of a short-lived flow matching a >> single hash table entry is .25" > >> That would be a very poor hash function. > > That would be a disturbingly bad hash function. But let me ask this: > do you think the model would be workable with a better hash function?
The model works. I just don't see the point of running several inferior hash functions instead of one good one. Brian _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
