On 16/01/2013 08:17, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 16/01/2013 08:02, Melinda Shore wrote:
>> On 1/15/13 10:55 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>> "Let us assume the probability of a short-lived flow matching a
>>> single hash table entry is .25"
>>> That would be a very poor hash function.
>> That would be a disturbingly bad hash function. But let me ask this:
>> do you think the model would be workable with a better hash function?
>
> The model works. I just don't see the point of running several inferior
> hash functions instead of one good one.
Ram has convinced me off line that the algorithm for large flow recognition
suggested in the draft does make sense. I hope the next version will make
this clearer.
Brian
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
