On 4/30/13 12:51 AM, Rong Zhang wrote: > Hello Wes George, > > Thanks for your kind comments, > for 1) your comments is right, same as other comment as well, we will > update capwap-extension to standard track other than informational > document once submit to 00 WG document if it is adopted. Since it is > only about 11n part other than update original 5416document, so we > didn't use "bis". > for 2) RFC 5415 has recommended Split and Local, capwap-hybrid-mac is > not trying to obsolete them, but define a new model in the middle, it > does not write the normaltive text, so it won't belongs to the scope > of standard.
Wes: Can you live with this? Melinda _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
