On 4/30/13 10:07 AM, George, Wes wrote: > I guess someone needs to decide if this is truly > considered a small-scale extension and enough of the former CAPWAP > participants are involved in OpsAWG such that we get the right level > of review. If the answer to those questions is yes, I'd be fine with > adopting this one.
Well, I think the "someone" is us as a group. Taking off my chair hat, I think that this is pretty clearly not a major revision of capwap and would not merit a 'bis' document. There's also been a considerable amount of outreach to former capwap participants and to the IEEE 802.11n community, which may have not been visible to working group participants. Melinda _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
