I would be as well. /jon On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:34 PM, David Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
>> we have published a draft on a new authentication protocol for USM for SNMP. >> >> Abstract >> >> This memo specifies a new optional HMAC-SHA-256-128 authentication >> protocol for the User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3 defined >> in RFC 3414. >> >> The new protocol is a straightforward adaptation of the protocols >> HMAC-MD5-96 and HMAC-SHA-96 from RFC 3414 to the >> SHA-256 based HMAC with truncation to 128 bits. Comments and >> suggestions are welcome. >> >> Is there any interest in adoption by the WG? > > Yes, I would like to see this adopted by the working group and I'm > willing to review documents. We implemented SHA-2 in almost exactly > the same way that this document suggests. We would almost certainly > implement the standard version if the working group adopts it. > > -David Reid > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
