stupid me, I forgot to include the link to the draft:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hmac-sha-256-128-usm-snmp-00.txt
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hmac-sha-256-128-usm-snmp-00

Johannes




Johannes Merkle schrieb am 05.11.2013 16:58:
> we have published a draft on a new authentication protocol for USM for SNMP.
> 
> Abstract
> 
>    This memo specifies a new optional HMAC-SHA-256-128 authentication
>    protocol for the User-based Security Model (USM) for SNMPv3 defined
>    in RFC 3414.
> 
> The new protocol is a straightforward adaptation of the protocols HMAC-MD5-96 
> and HMAC-SHA-96 from RFC 3414 to the
> SHA-256 based HMAC with truncation to 128 bits. Comments and suggestions are 
> welcome.
> 
> Is there any interest in adoption by the WG?
> 


_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to