On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear OpsAWG WG, > > The authors of draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel have indicated that > they believe that the document is ready, and have asked for Working > Group Last Call[0]. > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for > publication and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > This WGLC ends Mon 25-Aug-2014.
One week has passed, and I haven't seen any feedback / review. This document is 12 pages, 8 if you remove the boilerplate / whitespace. Much if the rest of it is diagrams and such. It is, IMO, a quick and easy read, shouldn't take more than 10-15 minutes. Go on, try it. You might like it... W > > > > In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with > Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)": > Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to > draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel? If so, has this IPR been > disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? > (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.) > > > Thanks, > Warren Kumari > (as OpsAWG WG co-chair) > > [0]: Actually, they asked a while back, but it slipped through the cracks. -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
