Hello all,  

I have reviewed this document. In general, the problem and use case described 
in this draft is clear and the draft is in a good shape.

comments:
In page 9, the Tunnel-Type definition does not have GRE tunnel type. Should 
this be included as one tunnel type?


Thanks,
--  
Dapeng Liu


在 2014年8月19日 星期二,22:44,Warren Kumari 写道:

> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
> > Dear OpsAWG WG,
> >  
> > The authors of draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel have indicated that
> > they believe that the document is ready, and have asked for Working
> > Group Last Call[0].
> >  
> > The draft is available here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel/
> >  
> > Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for
> > publication and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
> >  
> > This WGLC ends Mon 25-Aug-2014.
>  
> One week has passed, and I haven't seen any feedback / review.
> This document is 12 pages, 8 if you remove the boilerplate /
> whitespace. Much if the rest of it is diagrams and such. It is, IMO, a
> quick and easy read, shouldn't take more than 10-15 minutes.
>  
> Go on, try it. You might like it...
>  
> W
>  
>  
>  
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with
> > Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)":
> > Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to
> > draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel? If so, has this IPR been
> > disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules?
> > (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.)
> >  
> >  
> > Thanks,
> > Warren Kumari
> > (as OpsAWG WG co-chair)
> >  
> > [0]: Actually, they asked a while back, but it slipped through the cracks.
>  
>  
>  
> --  
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
> ---maf
>  
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>  
>  


_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to