A month on, what is the WG chairs take on this? Tom Petch
----- Original Message ----- From: "Warren Kumari" <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 8:11 PM > > Scott and I just chatted about this. > We see that there is interest in this topic, we think it is an > important topic, and we would like to adopt /a/ document that > addresses this. > > We'd appreciate it if the authors of draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp and > draft-hartman-snmp-sha2 can discuss how to move forward, possibly by > combining the documents into one, or selecting one and folding in > comments from the other. > > Again, we think that this is an important topic, and would like to get > the best possible document adopted. > > Warren and Scott. > > > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear OpsAWG WG, > > > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp. > > > > The draft is available here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp/ > > > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for > > adoption by OpsAWG, > > and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > > > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > > > This call for adoption ends Mon 25-Aug-2014. > > > > In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with > > Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"): > > If you are personally aware of any IPR that applies to > > draft-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance > > with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more > > details.) > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Warren Kumari > > (as OpsAWG WG co-chair) > > > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
