please resubmit this draft under your name - e.g.,
draft-delaney-opsawg-tacacs
Only documents that have been formally accepted by a WG to be a WG document can
use the draft-wg_name type of name
we can have a discussion on the ID after you resubmit under your own
name to see if the WG supports
adopting it and it fits in our charter (if it does not fit in the charter we
word have to discuss revising the
charter with our ADs and with the IESG)
Scot
> On Jun 12, 2015, at 3:23 AM, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> TACACS+ is a protocol widely deployed, based upon a draft specification that
> Cisco submitted in 1998, but never completed to RFC status. The original
> draft has been tidied and lightly enhanced and resubmitted, with the intent
> to finally get it published as a standard.
>
> The best fit that we could see was for the opsawg.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Regards,
>
> Doug.
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
