Many Thanks Scott. Re-submitted.
Regards, Doug On 12/06/2015 10:47, "Scott O. Bradner" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Jun 12, 2015, at 5:45 AM, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >> Thanks Scott, >> >> Should I unsubmit the original? > >yes if the cancelation I just did failed in some way > >Scott > >> >> On 12/06/2015 10:19, "Scott O. Bradner" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> please resubmit this draft under your name - e.g., >>> >>> draft-delaney-opsawg-tacacs >>> >>> Only documents that have been formally accepted by a WG to be a WG >>> document can use the draft-wg_name type of name >>> >>> we can have a discussion on the ID after you resubmit under your own >>> name to see if the WG supports >>> adopting it and it fits in our charter (if it does not fit in the >>>charter >>> we word have to discuss revising the >>> charter with our ADs and with the IESG) >>> >>> Scot >>> >>>> On Jun 12, 2015, at 3:23 AM, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) >>>><[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> TACACS+ is a protocol widely deployed, based upon a draft >>>>specification >>>> that Cisco submitted in 1998, but never completed to RFC status. The >>>> original draft has been tidied and lightly enhanced and resubmitted, >>>> with the intent to finally get it published as a standard. >>>> >>>> The best fit that we could see was for the opsawg. >>>> >>>> Many thanks, >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Doug. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OPSAWG mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OPSAWG mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
